What are we looking for?
DIV funds development innovations, which can include:
Other elements DIV is looking for in applications include:
Innovations are not required to be technology-based, but they should be evidence-informed.
A theory of change describes the causal logic of how a given project, program, or policy will achieve intended outcomes. They generally identify the inputs and activities that go into implementing an intervention, the resulting outputs, and the outcomes and final impacts stemming from successful implementation of activities and outputs.
DIV wants to clearly understand what development impacts the solution will achieve, such as higher income or lower mortality rates. Even early-stage innovations should have an evidence-informed theory of change.
A Long-Term Plan
DIV cares about pathways to scale and sustainability. The strongest applications lay out a roadmap for how a given solution will reach the maximum number of people affected by a problem and continue to benefit those people beyond DIV support. This roadmap includes not only how the solution will be funded in the long-term through revenue generation or public-sector support (like a developing country government), but also how the organization and its operations will evolve to sustain the solution at scale.
A Thoughtful, Honest Analysis of the Competitive Landscape
DIV is looking for an honest assessment of what makes your solution better and more cost-effective than alternatives. You should consider all products, services, and approaches that can achieve the development outcome you care about as competition, even if the product, service, or approach is unlike yours. There are alternative solutions for achieving most development objectives. The best DIV applications demonstrate that they have researched what other solutions exist for achieving the same outcomes that demonstrate how their innovation does it better than these alternative solutions.
Specificity and Detail About the Problem and the Solution
While a broad understanding of the problem you will address is great, an understanding of the potential impact on the specific setting of the proposed activities (or the smallest unit of analysis that includes that setting) is better.
Information about the Costs to Deliver the Solution
We cannot think about unit economics and cost-effectiveness without understanding costs. Strong applicants include all costs, from production to implementation. If you do not know how much it costs, you should estimate and be clear about what assumptions helped form that estimate.
What are we not looking for?